177 EAST 77TH

New 11 Story and Penthouse Modern Fireproof Apartment House

BUILT and MANAGED BY

Sidney & Arthur Diamond

570 Lexington Avenue, Plaza 3‑1630
Representative on Premises

  • Built 1941; first tenants that September
  • Boak & Paris, Inc., Architects
  • Rendered by Bury Sorlien, 1941
  • Yorkville, Manhattan, between Lexington and Third

The building and its garden

177 East 77th Street is an eleven-story-and-penthouse apartment house on the north side of 77th Street between Lexington and Third Avenues, in Manhattan. It was designed by Boak & Paris for the developers Sidney and Arthur Diamond and opened in September 1941 with fifty-two apartments, each with a private terrace.

The building was planned around a private garden behind it, in the interior of the block: about eleven thousand square feet of lawn, magnolias, hedges, paths and fountains. Along the garden's east side stood the Cottages, eight apartments with Regency-style rear fronts that the Goelet family had built over a row of Third Avenue shops in 1937. The Diamonds bought the 77th Street plot from Robert Goelet, leased the rest of the ground, including the Cottages, and bought that too in 1946. The garden was the main selling point. Every floor plan in the 1941 leasing brochure is lettered east 77th street along the bottom edge and overlooking landscaped garden along the top.

The Diamonds kept the property for fifty-five years. After Arthur Diamond died in 1996 it was sold to developers, and in 1998, after a preservation campaign failed, the garden was destroyed. A thirty-two-story condominium tower, The Empire, was built on the northern half of the site. The northern cottages were demolished. The southern half of the row was kept as a two-story wing of the new development, so the apartments on the east side of 177 East 77th Street still have open light and air.

This page reproduces the 1941 brochure and sets out the history of the site, the building, the garden and the redevelopment, with sources for each.

Tennis courts and eight cottages

By 1929 Robert Goelet had assembled all twelve lots on the west side of Third Avenue between 77th and 78th, a blockfront of old-law tenements with shops beneath, facing the Third Avenue elevated railway. In 1936 the city required extensive fireproofing of pre‑1901 tenements. Rather than pay for it, Goelet demolished the row.

The replacement, designed by the architect-engineer Edward H. Faile, was a two-story taxpayer: a low, inexpensive building meant to cover the property taxes until a larger one became worth building. Taxpayers dominated new construction on the avenues during the Depression. Of the building plans filed for Madison, Lexington and Third in 1929, seven per cent were for buildings of one to three stories; by 1933 all of them were. They were usually built on land held by an estate or a chain, the only owners with money to rebuild, and they were usually Art Deco or Art Moderne, to draw passers-by into the shops.

Faile's Third Avenue front was plain brick with plate-glass shopfronts, mottled glass transoms and projecting round corner canopies. Above the shops were eight one-bedroom apartments. Because the entire ground floor was let to stores, the apartments were entered from the back.

The rear was designed in a different style, as an English Regency row: brick painted white, each apartment with a small projecting vestibule under a concave roof and delicate iron railings, reached by two flights of stairs from the block's interior. On the avenue side the windows were filled with Owens‑Illinois Insulux glass block, introduced in 1935, which let in light while deadening the noise of the el. Only the kitchens, where the code demanded operable sash, got steel casements. On the open ground behind, which included the site of this building, Goelet laid out tennis and badminton courts.

Turning a row of buildings around to face a shared garden was not Faile's invention. Vincent Pepe had done it in Greenwich Village from the late 1910s, combining thirteen houses on Minetta Street and merging their back yards into a common garden entered from the rear. His promotional brochure sold the scheme as a refuge for artists, and The Times in 1923 called it as peaceful as though miles away. Turtle Bay Gardens, Treadwell Farm, MacDougal-Sullivan Gardens and Hudson View Gardens used the same idea through the twenties and thirties. What set the Cottages apart, in the reading of the architectural historian Andrew Dolkart, is that nobody else tried it with a taxpayer.

The site before the buildingAbout 1938, looking north-east across the courts to the white Regency rear of the cottages and their double stair. Every front door in that row is on this side; the Third Avenue fronts were stores, and the el is just beyond the frame. 177 East 77th Street was built on this ground three years later. The small sign on the fence reads Courts for Rent. The print is in the Avery Architectural Library at Columbia, the university that also holds the brochure.
The Third Avenue frontPlate-glass shopfronts, a projecting round canopy, the pale glass frieze Lewis Mumford called mottled lilac, and a blind end wall with a round window on 77th Street. The el's shadow lies across the roadway. When The Times covered the fight over the cottages in 1997 it ran a coarser print of what appears to be the same photograph, dated 1937 and credited to the Office of Metropolitan History. The city's tax survey is generally dated 1939 to 1941, so if it is the same negative, one of the two dates is wrong.

This is the first series of apartments in New York which shows a serious attempt to do something about the elevated trains which rattle by continuously.

Architectural Forum, December 1937

In 1941 Goelet sold the Diamonds the East 77th Street portion of the plot, where the tennis courts were, and leased them the remainder, including the Cottages and the ground that became the garden. The Diamonds built their apartment house on the portion they owned. The Cottages stayed as they were, and the trade press pointed out the benefit: with only two stories on the avenue, nothing would block light and air to the new building's east terraces.

…assures complete protection of light and air and guarantees privacy to the terrace suites on the east side.

Real Estate Record and Builders Guide, 2 August 1941, on the retention of the Cottages

That protection depended on the lease. The Cottages and the garden still belonged to Goelet, and if the lease had ended and a taller building gone up on the avenue, it would have walled in every east-facing terrace at 177 East 77th Street. In 1946 the Diamonds removed the risk by buying the leased property outright. From then on they owned both lots: the apartment house on one, the Cottages and garden on the other.

Block 1412, lot by lot

Beginning in 1939 the city's Department of Taxes photographed every lot in New York for assessment purposes, hanging a numbered plate in the foreground of each shot. The survey reached this block, bounded by 77th and 78th Streets and by Third and Lexington, in the two years before the Diamonds built. The purpose was valuation, but the effect is a street-level record of the ground under 177 East 77th Street just before it was built over.

The numbered plates also show how the land was divided. 177 East 77th Street is block 1412, lot 31. The cottages and the garden are lot 33. They were never one property. The view the building was drawn around and advertised on sat on a lot the Diamonds did not own in 1941, and no lease on an apartment in lot 31 gave a tenant any right over lot 33. In 1998 the tenants of 177 argued otherwise in court, and lost.

1412 – 30The site. Behind the windscreen are the courts; the small sign on the fence reads East 78 Tennis Club, Courts for Rent. The blank party wall in the middle distance belongs to the tenement on the next lot west, which is why the plans letter the building's west face windows on 7th, 8th & 9th floors only.
1412 – 42From East 78th Street, looking in at the ground that became the garden. The low shuttered building at left with the round window is the north end of the cottages; the fenced open space beyond it is the courts. The truck parked in front belongs to an ice and coal dealer, and advertises logs, ice, kerosene and canned gas.
1412 – 29Walk-ups on the next lot in from the courts: five stories of old-law tenement, fire escapes and stoops. They are still standing, immediately to the left of 177 East 77th as you face it from the street. Their east flank is the blank party wall behind the fence in lot 30.
1412 – 28The next lot west again: a white parking garage with a blade sign and its number on the fascia, Garage 165. House numbers fall toward Lexington, so the garage is on that side and the walk-ups sit between it and the site. In 1940, then, the 77th Street side of the block ran, from west to east: garage, walk-ups, tennis courts, cottages.

Boak & Paris

Russell M. Boak and Hyman F. Paris met in the office of Emery Roth, one of the most prolific apartment-house architects in New York. They left to practise on their own in 1927, and like Roth they made their name on apartment buildings, with a run of Art Deco theatres alongside. Their work grew plainer as the thirties went on, moving from Deco ornament to the stripped, streamlined Moderne of this building.

Sidney R. and Arthur W. Diamond were brothers from the Bronx who both took law degrees at Columbia — Sidney in the class of 1922, Arthur in 1926 — and then went into real estate instead. With a third brother, Harold, they built out a family business of apartment houses and shopping centres across Manhattan, Queens and the Bronx; Arthur spent the war as a captain in the Army Corps of Engineers. Only Sidney and Arthur are named on this building. They hired Boak & Paris repeatedly. The firm gave them 160 East 89th Street in 1937. In 1939 they commissioned a ten-story-and-penthouse building for the site of four brownstones at 166 to 172 East 77th Street, finished the next year as 170 East 77th. In 1940 they began 177 East 77th, across the street. They held this building, and the garden and cottages behind it, until Arthur Diamond died in 1996, fifty-five years after it opened.

177 East 77th was the firm's third building for the Diamonds, put up a few doors from the second, and it repeats the firm's habits: a recessed central bay, and forty-five-degree chamfered corners that let a window turn the corner instead of stopping at it, as they had on East 89th Street three years before.

The brochure's plans show the inside of the building and nothing of the outside. From the street it is sandy-coloured brick with a recessed centre and an understated entrance carrying incised ornament of a Mayan cast. There is no other decoration on the facade. The design relies on massing, setbacks and the corner windows.

With so little ornament, the windows were an important part of the design, and the brochure lists them: steel casement windows specially equipped with fresh air ventilators, thin enough in section to let the glass wrap the chamfered corners. They have since been replaced, the one substantial loss to the elevation. Otherwise the building stands close to the way Bury Sorlien drew it.

The lobbyThe lobby has the ornament the facade lacks. The curved wall by the elevator is incised with a repeating square spiral, the same Mayan-inflected geometry as the panel at the front door. The mirrored returns double the room's width, and the short flight at the rear is the step up out of the lobby drawn on the ground floor plan. Photographed by Wurts Bros. on 13 April 1948. The Museum of the City of New York catalogues the negative as 115 East 77th Street, a wrong number, and gives the architects as Boak & Rand, evidently Boak & Raad, the successor firm. Given that credit and a date seven years after opening, this may be a redecoration and not the 1941 lobby.

Thirty working days

During the boom, the sound of the riveter was loud in the city. Now it is so quiet you can hear a girder fall for miles away.

James Thurber, “New York in the Third Winter,” Fortune, January 1932

Thurber was describing the collapse of construction in the Depression. By 1941 building had resumed, but riveting was not used on this site. In July The Times reported that all the steel girders and columns of 177 East 77th Street were bolted, which the owners said was to spare a residential block the noise.

The same report describes how the trades overlapped to save time. Concrete was poured to keep the slab within two floors of the steel. When the concrete crews reached the seventh floor the bricklayers started; when the brick reached the sixth, the partition work began. For a stretch the steel men, the concrete men and the bricklayers were all working at once.

The exterior brickwork was finished in thirty working days. By early July, with occupancy still two months off, the renting manager reported half the suites already leased from the plans. By September an advertisement claimed ninety per cent, and listed four selling points: fifty-two apartments, each with a private terrace; eleven thousand square feet of private garden; a roof garden; three and four rooms each.

The private terraces for every apartment, the 11,000 square feet of landscaped, private garden adjoining the building, the spaciousness of the rooms and the architectural design of the building have been strong attractions to prospective tenants.

Carleton Otis, renting manager, quoted in The New York Times, 6 July 1941 — read the clipping
1411 – 42No photograph of this building under construction has turned up, but the tax survey caught its predecessor. This is 170 East 77th Street going up across the street a year or two earlier, bare steel behind a tarpaulin, with the Diamonds' hoarding reading 170 East 77 · 10 Story–Penthouse Apartment · 3, 3½, 4 Room Suites over a lozenge with their name in it. Their trademark was a diamond. The sequence the Times described at 177, with concrete two floors behind the steel and brick behind the concrete, would have looked much like this.

The plates

Four of the brochure's six sheets are plans, printed in green-black ink with some apartments washed in pale sage. The apartments are lettered A through E on each floor, and the rooms are named in the vocabulary of the period: a bedroom is a chamber, the entrance corridor a gallery, and most suites have a dining alcove where a dining room would be. Terraces are dimensioned to the inch.

Two small annotations explain features of the building. Beside the service hall on every floor are the words incin. and flue, the incinerator shaft. Along the side walls, in small lettering, are windows on 7th, 8th & 9th floors only to the west and windows on 3rd to 9th floors only to the east. Below those floors the flanks are blind, because the walk-ups stand against the west wall and the two-story avenue building against the east.

·2nd to 9th Floor Plan·The typical floor, spread across a double page, with the inset variant of Apartment B used on the second, third and fourth floors, and a compass rose showing the block's true north — the avenue grid runs some 29 degrees off it.
·Penthouse· and ·Ground Floor·The top and bottom floors on one sheet. Most of the penthouse floor is terrace: one of eighty-eight feet by forty-five on the garden side, and six more around the other three sides. On the ground floor, the lobby opens off East 77th Street with the rental office beside it.
·11th· and ·10th Floor·Where the setbacks begin. The tenth floor gains deep terraces on the east and west flanks; the eleventh steps in again, and its largest chamber gets a dressing room and a shower.
·2nd to 9th Floor Plan·, single sheetThe same typical floor issued on its own, with the wordmark and the Diamond brothers' imprint beneath it: Representative on Premises. Presumably this was the sheet handed to a walk-in prospect.

Fifty-two terrace apartments

The features pageHand-lettered, with each amenity run into the next on a four-dot ellipsis.
  • 2, 3, 4 and 5 Room Suites
  • Overlooking beautiful landscaped park, known as Lenox Hill Park, facing on 78th Street
  • Area nine thousand square feet
  • Separate passenger and service elevator
  • Steel casement windows specially equipped with fresh air ventilators
  • Separate dinettes and dining spaces
  • Full size kitchens
  • Large General Electric refrigerators
  • Clothes closets equipped with lights
  • Seven large closets in four room apartments; five in three room apartments
  • Glass enclosed stall showers
  • Special soundproofed partitions between apartments
  • Complete laundry with electric washing machine and driers
  • Maid's lavatories
  • Quiet plumbing
  • Roof garden

The most expensive private garden in the whole city of New York

The phrase is Sidney Diamond's, from 1966, when The New York Times sent a reporter through the gates. The Diamonds had built the garden for about ten thousand dollars and kept a gardener, Frank Lamanna, on the payroll. Behind a pair of gates on 78th Street there were magnolias, trimmed hedges, grass, fountains and footpaths, with the eight cottages overlooking the garden from its east side and two cement staircases climbing to their doors. The Times called them red-brick; if that is right, the white paint of 1937 had gone by then. The street floor beneath them, leased to a florist, a bar, a hairdresser and a supermarket on Third Avenue, could not be seen from the garden, and the garden could not be seen from the avenue.

Each cottage had a small front patio and a private lawn. Lamanna kept those up too, though some residents preferred to do their own gardening. In 1965 the cottagers used one of the lawns for summer cookouts and sunbathing and invited friends to a spring planting party. Six of the eight were rent-controlled homes at $150 to $250 a month; the other two were let to businesses as hospitality suites. The cottages at the north end went mostly to bachelors, and that stretch was known among the neighbours as Bachelor Row.

At one time we were planning to build a 25-story apartment building in place of the garden and the cottages. But store values have increased so much on Third Avenue that we decided to maintain the property in its present state.

Sidney Diamond, 1966
Box hedge, steps, and the cottage terrace beyond.
The path in from the 78th Street gates.
The fountain in its ring of hedge.

The block changes hands

1412 – 31The building, in the second tax survey, forty-odd years on. Sandy brick, the setbacks, the terraces.
1412 – 33And the cottages, still there, still two stories, shopfronts leased along the avenue — with 177 East 77th Street standing over them at the left, its east terraces clear of anything taller. These are among the last photographs of the arrangement intact.

Arthur W. Diamond died in 1996, leaving the property to a charitable trust. Within months it was under contract for close to fifteen million dollars to a joint venture of Davis & Partners and RFR Holding, who proposed a condominium tower of some thirty-odd stories with three- to six-bedroom apartments. The plan was to demolish the garden and half the cottages and reface the other half in limestone and granite to match the tower.

Five elderly tenants were left in the cottages by then, each of whom had lived there more than twenty-five years, paying between $225 and $1,650 a month. In March 1997 they were served with intent-to-evict notices. They responded by holding six open houses in five months, the first public access in sixty years, and the tenants of 177 East 77th Street, whose terraces had been let in 1941 on this view, joined them. The campaign published as Save the Cottages and Garden and took contributions through the Association of Neighbors on the Upper East Side; The Times called it the Coalition to Save the Cottages and Garden.

The campaign was fast and well connected, and it failed. The eviction notices went out in March 1997 and Dolkart's history of the complex was finished by 22 April. It enlisted Robert A. M. Stern, won the support of Woody Allen, Tony Randall, Celeste Holm and Tammy Grimes, and was still calling people out to rallies in April 1998, four months before the end. It sued to force the Landmarks Preservation Commission to hold a hearing. The commission had taken the cottages to its designation committee five times across three mayoral administrations and declined each time, judging them not significant enough architecturally, historically or culturally. A judge refused the tenants of 177 a restraining order and told their counsel he had a hard row to hoe.

High-quality examples of ‘everyday architecture’ of a type that seems to have disappeared from our more cynical and expedient post-World War II city.

Robert A. M. Stern on the Cottages and their garden, 1997
1898
Robert Goelet buys three of the twelve tenement lots on the Third Avenue blockfront; by 1929 he holds all twelve.
1936–37
The tenements come down. Edward H. Faile builds the taxpayer — shops below, eight Regency cottages above and behind — and tennis courts on the rest of the plot.
1941
Sidney and Arthur Diamond buy the 77th Street plot and lease the rest. They build 177 East 77th Street on the courts and lay out the garden on the leased ground toward 78th Street. Occupancy in September.
1946
The Diamonds buy the two-story building on Third Avenue from the Goelets, securing the eastern light and air.
1966
The Times reports on the garden. Sidney Diamond says a 25-story replacement was considered and dropped.
1985, 1988
The Cottages are nominated for landmark designation and passed over. The Friends of the Upper East Side later name them among the neighbourhood's most endangered sites.
1996
Arthur W. Diamond dies. The property goes under contract. The Diamond Foundation pledges $7 million to Columbia Law School from the proceeds.
1998
In August the five remaining cottagers accept a confidential settlement and move out by the end of the month. The garden is destroyed and the northern range of cottages demolished. The southern range stays, and with it the open eastern view from 177 East 77th Street.
1999
The Empire tops out in the summer and is finished that year: thirty-two stories where the garden was.

To me, the Cottages represents a kind of force field — it wants to stay as it is. And I realize that my house is part of my identity.

Rue Faris Drew, Cottage E, on leaving, August 1998

What stands there now

The tower built on the site is The Empire: thirty-two stories, seventy-seven apartments, topped out in the summer of 1999 and finished that year. It was built by the same RFR/Davis venture that had bought the block, to designs by Hartman-Cox Architects of Washington, with the apartment interiors by Schuman Lichtenstein Claman Efron. It is Post-Modern in style: rose-coloured brick with pre-cast stone cut to read as limestone, a six-story base, bay windows on chamfered corners, and steeply raked green gables at the top. There is a new private garden, by Thomas Balsley Associates, and planting on the terraces of the base.

Its bulk sits at the northern end of the site, on 78th Street, which is why the cottages at the 77th Street end could be left where they were. The northern half of the row was demolished for the tower. The southern half was kept, but not as cottages: it belongs to The Empire, with retail on both floors and a roof deck for the tower's residents on top. The whole of the old property, garden and cottages alike, became The Empire, though the tower itself covers only the northern half.

The garden and the cottages were entered through a gatehouse on East 78th Street, and the tower takes its address from the same street: The Empire is 188 East 78th Street.

The tower has its admirers. Carter Horsley, reviewing it for CityRealty, finds it tall and handsome, thinks the controversy was natural but the result a clear improvement, and judges the loss of the cottages not the end of the world for the Upper East Side.

Half of what the brochure promised is gone. The tower stands on the garden itself, and the terraces lettered overlooking landscaped garden along their upper edge now face a thirty-two-story wall.

The other half is still there. The eastern exposure is the side for which the Real Estate Record promised complete protection of light and air in 1941, and the side the Diamonds bought the Third Avenue blockfront in 1946 to secure. It still looks out over a two-story building, now The Empire's roof deck, because the southern half of the row is the half that was kept.

Sources

Every claim on this page is drawn from something listed below. Most of it can be opened from here. A few things are quoted at second hand, from Dolkart's report or Gray's columns rather than from the originals, and those entries say so.

The document this page is built on

  • 177 East 77th. Leasing brochure. New York: Sidney & Arthur Diamond, 1941. Six sheets — cover rendering signed Bury Sorlien; ground, second-to-ninth, tenth, eleventh and penthouse floor plans by Boak & Paris, Inc., Architects; features page. Printed by Big G Press, New York. Accession YR 0473.114, New York Real Estate Brochure Collection, Columbia University Libraries.

Photographs

  • New York City Department of Taxes. Photographs of Manhattan block 1412, lots 28, 29, 30, 33 and 42, and of block 1411, lot 42. c. 1939–41. NYC Municipal Archives; more than 700,000 of the negatives were digitised by the Department of Records and Information Services in 2018. Located here through 1940s.nyc, Julian Boilen's 2020 map of the survey, which spares you looking up block and lot by hand.
  • Wurts Bros. Apartment lobby, 177 East 77th Street. Negative, 13 April 1948. Museum of the City of New York, X2010.7.1.9362 (MNY242917). Catalogued there as 115 East 77th Street, and with the architects given as Boak & Rand.
  • New York City Department of Finance. Tax photographs of Manhattan block 1412, lots 31 and 33. 1980s. NYC Municipal Archives. Located here through 80s.nyc, Brandon Liu and Jeremy Lechtzin's map of the later survey.
  • Edward Hausner. The garden, looking north toward the Cottages. The New York Times, 29 May 1966, published with Greene's article below.
  • Looking north-east across the rear garden of the Goelet apartments, c. 1938. Avery Architectural Library, Columbia University. Published with Gray's 2014 Streetscapes column, whose caption notes that the entrances to the second-floor apartments were on this side, that the Third Avenue fronts were stores, and that the El is just out of view. Photographer not named.
  • The Cottages from Third Avenue at East 77th Street, dated 1937. Office of Metropolitan History. Published with Rozhon's 1997 article below; held here as a screen capture of the newspaper's TimesMachine facsimile.
  • The garden and the rear of the Cottages. Three colour photographs, with a low-resolution variant of each; the illustrations to Dolkart's report, where they carry neither caption nor credit. Photographer and date not established.

Newspapers and periodicals

  • James Thurber. “New York in the Third Winter.” Fortune, January 1932. Quoted via Gray, 2004.
  • “A Panel of Taxpayers.” Architectural Forum 67 (February 1937), 158–61. Quoted via Dolkart.
  • “Apartments 77th Street and 3rd Avenue, New York City.” Architectural Forum 67 (December 1937), 510–11. Quoted via Dolkart.
  • Lewis Mumford. “The Sky Line: Chairs and Shops.” The New Yorker, 9 April 1938, 59. Quoted via Dolkart.
  • “Bolting Replaces Riveting on New Building; Each Suite in East Side House Has Terrace.” The New York Times, 6 July 1941. Unsigned. nytimes.com
  • “Private Terraces Prove Primary Renting Inducement.” Real Estate Record and Builders Guide, 2 August 1941, 9. Quoted via Dolkart.
  • Ellen L. Greene. “A Hidden Garden Graces Cottages Off Third Avenue.” The New York Times, 29 May 1966; continued on page 8 as “3d Ave. Cottages Offer Seclusion.” nytimes.com
  • Tracie Rozhon. “Jockeying for Position in a Battle Over 8 Hidden Cottages on Third Avenue.” The New York Times, 28 August 1997, section C, page 1. nytimes.com
  • Tracie Rozhon. “Cottage Tenants Settle With Developers.” The New York Times, 15 August 1998, section B, page 3. nytimes.com
  • Christopher Gray. “Streetscapes: Minetta Lane and Minetta Street; Vestiges of a Developer's Greenwich Village Enclave.” The New York Times, 29 August 1999, section 11, page 7. nytimes.com
  • Christopher Gray. “Streetscapes/Manhattan: From Deep in the Depression, Three Low-Rise Corners.” The New York Times, 29 August 2004, section 11, page 10. nytimes.com
  • Christopher Gray. “Manhattan Rowhouses With the Welcome Mat Out Back.” The New York Times, 21 November 2014; in print 23 November 2014, section RE, page 4, as “The Welcome Mat Moves Out Back.” nytimes.com

Reports, books and web

  • Andrew S. Dolkart. “The Cottages: A Brief History and Analysis.” Last revised 22 April 1997. Published by the Save the Cottages and Garden campaign at preserve.org/scg/dolkart.htm. Carries its own bibliography, which goes further than this page does. Read the copy held here
  • Save the Cottages and Garden. Campaign website, last revised 4 April 1998, soliciting contributions through the Association of Neighbors on the Upper East Side and calling on the Landmarks Preservation Commission to calendar a hearing. preserve.org/scg/scg.htm
  • Robert A. M. Stern, David Fishman and Jacob Tilove. New York 2000: Architecture and Urbanism Between the Bicentennial and the Millennium. New York: Monacelli Press, 2006. Quoted via Horsley.
  • Carter Horsley. “The Empire, 188 East 78th Street: Review and Ratings.” CityRealty, undated. cityrealty.com Accessed 18 September 2026.
  • Tom Miller. “Boak & Paris's 1941 177 East 77th Street,” 13 April 2024, and “Boak & Paris's 1940 170 East 77th Street,” 20 April 2024. Daytonian in Manhattan. Miller also traces the people who lived at 177 East 77th — two physicians, a violinist, two film producers — which is his own research and is better read there than summarised here.
  • Annice Alt. Boak & Paris / Boak & Raad, New York Architects. 2014. Named by Miller as the standard account of the firm; not consulted here.